Streetfilms » Curitiba’s BRT: Inspired Bus Rapid Transit Around the World

Streetfilms » Curitiba’s BRT: Inspired Bus Rapid Transit Around the World.

More on cheaper alternatives to the personal automobile and subways.  Light Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) are two great ideas that can fill the gap when money is tight and creativity is high on the part of planners. A lot of the people in the video are talking about how transportation planning have to go hand-in-hand with urban planning and city growth.  It’s a concept that some BC authorities haven’t really realized.

BRT in Curitiba, Brazil

There is no question that LRT and BRT impact the street level.  However, the supporters of these two technologies feel that this street-level impact is an advantage.  It forces cars off the road and creates a more livable and sustainable environment.  The road becomes permeable to pedestrians.  Subways and mini-metro systems like the SkyTrain do go faster at a separate grade, but simply create more space on the road for traffic.  Cambie Street may face increased traffic congestion because the train runs underground instead of at the surface. Plus, the #15 will longer be a trolley bus and who knows if the frequency of the bus will be diminshed or not.

I’m still disappointed that Kevin Falcon and the Ministry of Transportation has decided that the Evergreen Line should use SkyTrain techonology.  After years of public consultation that settled on LRT, the powers above waved their magic wand and made a change.  The same thing happened to the Millennium Line.  We would have had an LRT from Lougheed Town Centre all the way to UBC if it weren’t for Glen Clark’s interference at the time.

We should give LRT and BRT a chance. Definitely, we have a form of BRT in the B-Lines.  However, as other cities have shown, LRT and BRT are great alternatives to more road lanes and expensive metro systems.

Advertisements

2 comments

  1. Quote: “Streetfilms » Curitiba’s BRT: Inspired Bus Rapid Transit Around the World”

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but Curitiba’s model is completely unworkable in Europe and North America. Added to this, RapidBus is proven to be very poor in attracting new ridership (see Adelaide)

    In Curitiba both LRT and metro are being built to reduce congestion and pollution.

    1. My take on the Rapid Bus is that it works as a good solution when money is tight and a type of “rapid transit” is necessary. Your point about attracting new ridership is well taken. However, if a corridor is already overloaded with current ridership, then a Rapid Bus is a good solution to speed things up. The 99 B-Line along Broadway is a good example of a RapidBus bursting at its seams. It took pressure of the 9 Broadway milk run and gave existing riders a better option. It’s so popular that we can’t fit any more B-Line buses on that route. That’s why they’re looking at extending the SkyTrain or putting light rail down West Broadway.

      BRT is not perfect by any means, but it’s definitely a good, cost-effective transit measure if implemented well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s